Background Context
- Waqf refers to a permanent dedication of property by a Muslim for religious, pious, or charitable purposes recognized under Islamic law.
- Waqf-by-user is a long-standing category where usage and public perception over centuries determine Waqf status, even without formal registration or title deeds.
Relevance : GS 2(Governance)
Key Provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 Under Challenge
- Denotification of Waqf-by-user: Act removes legal recognition for Waqf-by-user category.
- Non-Muslims in Waqf bodies: Permits appointment of non-Muslims to administrative bodies like Central Waqf Council.
- State authority: Empowers state officials to determine whether a property is Waqf or government-owned.
Supreme Court Proceedings Highlights (April 16, 2025)
- Around 100 petitions heard together.
- Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna led a 3-judge Bench.
Three-Point Interim Relief Proposed by the CJI
Protection of Judicially Recognised Waqf Properties
- Properties already declared as Waqf by courts (including Waqf-by-user) not to be denotified temporarily.
- Covers those without registration or deed (e.g., Jama Masjid, Delhi).
Review of Property Status Can Continue
- Government officers may continue to assess Waqf vs. government property.
- But freeze on using such properties as non-Waqf in the meantime may be stayed.
Conditional Inclusion of Non-Muslims
- Non-Muslims maybeincluded as ex-officio members in Waqf bodies.
- Provided majority of other members remain Muslims, preserving religious representation.
Judicial Philosophy
- General Non-Intervention in Legislation:
- Court respects Parliament’s law-making power.
- But exceptional circumstances (e.g., rights, historical injustice) allow judicial scrutiny.
Current Status
- No interim order passed yet.
- Government requested more time for arguments.
- Next hearing scheduled for April 17, 2025 (2 PM).
Broader Implications
- Raises questions on constitutional protection of religious and minority rights.
- Balancing secular state administration with religious autonomy.
- Legal debate on retrospective invalidation of community-accepted property usage.