Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Supreme Court to examine concerns on POCSO clause

Context and Background

  • Section 19 of POCSO Act (2012) mandates reporting of any sexual activity involving minors (below 18), even if consensual.
  • The age of consent was raised from 16 to 18 years with the enactment of the POCSO Act.
  • The provision criminalises all sexual activity involving adolescents, regardless of mutual consent.

Relevance : GS2 (Governance, Vulnerable Sections, Health).

Issue Raised

  • Senior Advocate Indira Jaising (amicuscuriae) argued that:
    • Voluntary sexual activity between adolescents is being criminalised.
    • This undermines reproductive and mental health rights, especially of girls.
    • Parents, doctors, and guardians are punished for not reporting, even if acting in the best interests of the minor.
  • Medical professionals are forced to report to police even when adolescents seek care voluntarily , leading to:
    • Reluctance to seek help from formal health systems.
    • A shift to unqualified quacks, endangering adolescent health.

Key Legal Tension

  • Intention of Section 19:
    • Ensure timely state intervention and protection of children from sexual offences.
  • Unintended Consequences:
    • Criminalisation of consensual adolescent relationships.
    • Violation of right to health and privacy.
    • Deterrent to seeking medical and psychological care.

Broader Implications

  • Brings focus on the gap between law and adolescent realities.
  • Raises questions about:
    • Need for reform in the age of consent laws.
    • Balancing child protection with bodily autonomy and health rights.
  • May influence future legal reforms or judicial interpretation of POCSO provisions.

April 2025
MTWTFSS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930 
Categories