Static Quiz 17 March 2025 (Indian Polity)
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Static Quiz 17 March 2025 (Indian Polity) For UPSC Exam
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
If a law violates fundamental rights but is protected by a constitutional amendment under Article 368, which doctrine determines its validity?
CorrectCorrect Answer: (a) Doctrine of Basic Structure
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Basic Structure, established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), holds that Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot alter its fundamental framework. If a law violates fundamental rights and affects the basic structure, it can be struck down despite being passed under Article 368.IncorrectCorrect Answer: (a) Doctrine of Basic Structure
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Basic Structure, established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), holds that Parliament can amend the Constitution but cannot alter its fundamental framework. If a law violates fundamental rights and affects the basic structure, it can be struck down despite being passed under Article 368. - Question 2 of 5
2. Question
With respect to preventive detention in India, consider the following statements:
1. An individual can be detained under preventive detention laws without trial for up to three months.
2. Parliament can prescribe detention periods beyond three months with the approval of an advisory board.
3. The Constitution of India explicitly guarantees the right to legal representation in preventive detention cases.
How many of the above statements are correct?CorrectCorrect Answer: (c) Only two
Explanation:
• Statement 1 is correct as preventive detention laws allow detention without trial for up to three months.
• Statement 2 is correct since Parliament can extend the detention period with the approval of an advisory board consisting of judges.
• Statement 3 is incorrect because the right to legal representation in preventive detention cases is not explicitly guaranteed. In fact, under some laws, legal representation is denied unless permitted by the government.IncorrectCorrect Answer: (c) Only two
Explanation:
• Statement 1 is correct as preventive detention laws allow detention without trial for up to three months.
• Statement 2 is correct since Parliament can extend the detention period with the approval of an advisory board consisting of judges.
• Statement 3 is incorrect because the right to legal representation in preventive detention cases is not explicitly guaranteed. In fact, under some laws, legal representation is denied unless permitted by the government. - Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements regarding Article 32 of the Indian Constitution:
1.The Supreme Court has the power to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights.
2.High Courts cannot issue writs under Article 32.
3.The right to constitutional remedies under Article 32 is a fundamental right itself.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
CorrectCorrect Answer:(c) 1, 2, and 3
Explanation:
Statement 1 is correct as the Supreme Court has the power to issue writs under Article 32 to protect fundamental rights.
Statement 2 is correct because High Courts can issue writs under Article 226, not Article 32.
Statement 3 is correct since the right to move the Supreme Court for constitutional remedies is itself a fundamental right under Article 32.IncorrectCorrect Answer:(c) 1, 2, and 3
Explanation:
Statement 1 is correct as the Supreme Court has the power to issue writs under Article 32 to protect fundamental rights.
Statement 2 is correct because High Courts can issue writs under Article 226, not Article 32.
Statement 3 is correct since the right to move the Supreme Court for constitutional remedies is itself a fundamental right under Article 32. - Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Which of the following is/are considered reasonable restrictions on the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(2)?
1. Sovereignty and integrity of India
2. Friendly relations with foreign states
3. Incitement to an offense
4. Political criticism of the government
Select the correct answer using the code given below:CorrectCorrect Answer: (a) 1, 2, and 3 only
Explanation:
• Article 19(2) allows restrictions on speech in cases of threats to sovereignty and integrity, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency, morality, defamation, incitement to an offense, and contempt of court.
• Political criticism of the government is protected under free speech and does not fall under reasonable restrictions.IncorrectCorrect Answer: (a) 1, 2, and 3 only
Explanation:
• Article 19(2) allows restrictions on speech in cases of threats to sovereignty and integrity, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency, morality, defamation, incitement to an offense, and contempt of court.
• Political criticism of the government is protected under free speech and does not fall under reasonable restrictions. - Question 5 of 5
5. Question
A person’s citizenship in India can be revoked under which of the following circumstances?
1. If they voluntarily acquire citizenship of another country
2. If they engage in activities against the sovereignty and security of India
3. If they reside outside India for more than ten years without intent to return
Select the correct answer using the code given below:CorrectCorrect Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only
Explanation:
• Citizenship can be terminated if a person voluntarily acquires another country’s citizenship (Article 9 of the Constitution).
• Citizenship can also be revoked if the person engages in activities against the sovereignty, integrity, or security of India.
• However, mere residence outside India for ten years does not automatically lead to revocation unless combined with the intent to relinquish citizenship.IncorrectCorrect Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only
Explanation:
• Citizenship can be terminated if a person voluntarily acquires another country’s citizenship (Article 9 of the Constitution).
• Citizenship can also be revoked if the person engages in activities against the sovereignty, integrity, or security of India.
• However, mere residence outside India for ten years does not automatically lead to revocation unless combined with the intent to relinquish citizenship.
