Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

SC Questions Petition Alleging ‘Favouritism’ in Legal Profession

Context: Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara has petitioned the Supreme Court to abolish the senior advocate designation system, alleging it fosters elitism and privilege in the legal profession.

Relevance: GS 2 (Polity & Governance)

Senior Advocate Designation:

  • Governing Law: The designation is governed by Section 16 of the Advocates Act.
    • Criteria: Senior advocates are distinguished based on professional standing, expertise, and contributions to law.
    • Privileges: Senior advocates enjoy certain privileges, including pre-audience rights under Section 23(5) of the Act.

Petitioner’s Allegations:

  • Claims the designation process is biased in favor of judges’ relatives and influential personalities.
    • Asserts the system violates Article 14 (equality), Article 19 (right to practice any profession), and Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution.
    • Demands the abolition of the senior advocate designation and the Collegium system to combat perceived elitism in the judiciary.

Court’s Response:

  • Justice B.R. Gavai challenged the petitioner to provide concrete evidence of favoritism.
    • The Bench termed several claims in the petition as “scurrilous and unfounded”, granting the petitioner time to revise or withdraw the petition.
    • Strongly warned of action against the petitioners if baseless allegations are not removed.

Arguments by Mr. Nedumpara:

  • Cited the recent designation of 70 lawyers by the Delhi High Court as an example of bias.
    • Criticized the creation of a “special class” of advocates with privileges not available to others, calling it unconstitutional.

Court’s Position on Reflection:

  • Suggested that Mr. Nedumpara “reflect upon” the allegations and amend the petition.
    • Emphasized the need for factual substantiation rather than broad insinuations.

Possible Outcomes:

  • If the petition is not revised, the court may dismiss it or take action against the petitioners for making unsubstantiated claims.
    • The case could reignite debates about reforms in the legal profession, including the senior advocate designation and the Collegium system.

January 2025
MTWTFSS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
Categories