Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

How do habitual offender laws discriminate?

Context : Supreme Court’s Stand on Habitual Offender Laws

  • SC questioned the constitutional validity of these laws in Oct 2023, calling them “constitutionally suspect.”
  • Observed that such laws target Denotified Tribes (DNTs) and reinforce historical discrimination.
  • Urged states to review the necessity of these laws.

Relevance : GS 1(Society ) , GS 2(Governance , Polity)

Origin of the ‘Habitual Offender’ Concept

  • Colonial Beginnings: Started with Regulation XXII of 1793, allowing imprisonment of communities based on suspicion.
  • Criminal Tribes Act (CTA) 1871: Marked entire tribes as “criminal” by birth.
  • Repeal in 1952: CTA was repealed, and affected communities were classified as Denotified, Nomadic, and Semi-Nomadic Tribes (DNTs, NTs, SNTs).
  • Post-Independence Continuation: States enacted new “habitual offender” laws, shifting from community-based classification to individual-based classification.

Discriminatory Application of the Laws

  • Despite repealing CTA, states continued surveillance of DNT communities under habitual offender laws.
  • Crimes listed under these laws include vague terms like being a thug,” “lurking,” and belonging to a gang of dacoits.”
  • Rajasthan’s prison manuals explicitly allowed DNT community members to be labeled habitual offenders.

Historical and Contemporary Backlash

  • 1998 Case of Budhan Sabar: A custodial death that sparked outrage over the misuse of these laws.
  • Formation of DNT-RAG (Denotified and Nomadic Tribes Rights Action Group): Advocacy led by Mahasweta Devi and G.N. Devy.
  • UN Committee on Racial Discrimination (2007): Called for repeal of such laws.
  • Virginius Xaxa Committee (2014): Noted persistent stigma due to habitual offender laws.

Current Status in States

  • Repealed or Discontinued: Punjab, Haryana, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha (not implemented in 5+ years).
  • States Defending the Law:
    • Gujarat: Claims “intent” is not to harass DNTs.
    • Goa: Argues no DNTs exist in the state, so misuse is not possible.
    • Telangana: Calls it a preventive measure.
    • Uttar Pradesh: States it is covered under the Goondas Act.

Data on Habitual Offenders

  • NCRB 2022 Data: 1.9% of India’s 1.29 lakh convict population classified as habitual offenders.
  • Delhi: Highest proportion, with 21.5% of convicts labeled as habitual offenders.

Key Concerns and the Way Forward

  • Structural Discrimination: Continues targeting marginalized DNT communities.
  • Legal Ambiguity: Vague definitions allow arbitrary application.
  • Need for Repeal: SC and international bodies advocate for abolition to prevent abuse.
  • State Accountability: Ensuring legal reforms align with constitutional principles and human rights.

March 2025
MTWTFSS
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 
Categories