Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 17 February 2025

  1. The panchayati raj movement is in distress
  2. The silent crisis of rat-hole mining


Introduction

  • The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act (1992) institutionalized the Panchayati Raj System in India, marking a shift towards decentralized governance.
  • However, the momentum towards deepening local governance has stalled due to various structural, fiscal, and administrative challenges.
  • Big shifts in technology, society, and governance threaten the relevance of panchayats unless their role is redefined.

Relevance : GS2 – Governance, Decentralization, and Local Government

Practice Question : Examine the factors leading to the decline of the Panchayati Raj movement in India. Suggest measures to strengthen decentralized governance. (250 words)

Successes of Panchayati Raj

 Electoral Participation:

  • Panchayat elections are keenly contested across India, ensuring grassroots political engagement.
  • Women’s representation has significantly increased—nearly 14 lakh elected women representatives in local bodies.

 Implementation of Social Sector Schemes:

  • Various welfare and development schemes are now implemented through panchayats.
  • State Finance Commissions (SFCs) were mandated to ensure financial devolution to local governments.

Challenges & Reasons for the Decline

 Administrative Decentralization Has Stagnated

  • States have not fully devolved administrative powers to local governments.
  • Only 20% of states have transferred all 29 subjects listed in the Eleventh Schedule (Ministry of Panchayati Raj, 2022).
  • Lack of staff and bureaucratic control over functions weaken panchayat autonomy.

Fiscal Dependency & Loss of Autonomy

  • Reduction in untied grants:
    • 13th Finance Commission (2010-15): 85% untied grants.
    • 15th Finance Commission (2021-26): Reduced to 60%.
  • Increase in direct transfers (₹1.45 lakh crore → ₹2.36 lakh crore) has strengthened central control over funds.
  • Marginalization of state governments through conditional grants reduces local decision-making power.

Welfare State Model & Cash Transfers

  • Rise of Direct Benefit Transfers (DBTs) using the Jan Dhan-Aadhaar-Mobile (JAM) trinity bypasses panchayats.
  • Example: PM-KISAN Scheme (₹6,000 per farmer annually) operates without panchayat involvement, reducing local accountability and grievance redressal.

Urbanization & Shifting Policy Focus

  • Rural population declined from 75% (1990) to ~60% (present), shifting focus to urban governance.
  • Increased municipal reforms & urban financing lead to neglect of rural governance structures.

Ways to Revive the Panchayati Raj System

Strengthening Decentralization:

  • States must fully implement the Eleventh Schedule, ensuring true devolution of power.
  • Increase untied grants for local decision-making autonomy.

Reintegrating Panchayats in Welfare Delivery:

  • Make panchayats accountable for DBTs & grievance redressal in schemes like PM-KISAN.
  • Leverage digital tools to improve participation in planning & governance.

Expanding the Role of Panchayats:

  • Water conservation, renewable energy, and disaster risk management can be decentralized to panchayats.
  • Support for internal migration through rural-urban connectivity mechanisms.

New Vision for Panchayati Raj:

  • Redefine panchayats’ role in a changing governance model to ensure continued rural empowerment.


Background

  • Incident: The Gauhati High Court took suo motu cognisance of the mining tragedy in Umrangso, Assam (January 6, 2024).
  • Casualties: Nine labourers trapped, at least four dead.
  • Recurrent Issue: Similar tragedies in Meghalaya (30 miners dead in five years).
  • Core Issue: Weak enforcement of laws and unchecked operations by influential individuals.

Relevance : GS 3(Mining , Disastser Management )

Practice Question : Discuss the challenges associated with rat-hole mining in India and suggest policy measures to tackle them. (250 words)

Why Illegal Mining Persists?

Historical Context

  • 1980s Expansion: Driven by industrial demand from West Bengal & Bangladesh.
  • Terrain Challenge: Mechanized mining is difficult, leading to reliance on rat-hole mining.

Rat-Hole Mining Methods

  • Side-cutting: Coal seams extracted along hill slopes.
  • Box-cutting: Deep pits (up to 400 feet) with horizontal tunnels.

Hazards

  • Safety Risks: Narrow tunnels prone to collapse & flooding.
  • Labour Exploitation:
    • Migrant labourers trapped in debt cycles.
    • Children trafficked for mining due to their ability to navigate tunnels.
  • Environmental Degradation: Unclosed mine openings (~26,000), soil erosion, groundwater contamination.

Legal and Policy Aspects

Regulatory Actions

  • NGT Ban (2014): Prohibited rat-hole mining due to safety & environmental concerns.
  • Supreme Court (2019): Upheld the ban in State of Meghalaya v. All Dimasa Students Union.

Weak Enforcement

  • Influence of Bureaucrats & Coal Mafias: Illegal mines continue under their protection.
  • Threats to Whistleblowers: Activists & officials face intimidation.

Regulatory Loopholes & State Non-Compliance

  • Meghalaya:
    • Attempted exemption under Schedule 6, Paragraph 12A(b) to bypass MMDR Act (1957).
    • Passed a resolution for exemption but remains unapproved.
    • Section 23C of MMDR Act mandates prevention of illegal mining—yet no State law enforcement.
  • Assam:
    • Persistent illegal rat-hole mining despite NGT ban & Supreme Court directives.
    • No stringent State-level regulations to curb the practice.
    • Potential Central Intervention: As seen in Bellary, Karnataka (2011), where the Centre imposed a mining ban under Section 30 of MMDR Act.

Way Forward: A Multi-Faceted Approach

1. Stronger Legal Framework

  • Amend MMDR Act to criminalize rat-hole mining explicitly.
  • Stricter Penalties:
    • Enhance punishment under Section 21 for violations.
    • Establish monitoring & accountability mechanisms.

2. State-Specific Reforms

  • Empower State Governments under Section 23C of MMDR Act to regulate mining effectively.
  • Ensure enforcement of NGT ban by closing loopholes.

3. Alternative Livelihoods

  • Promote eco-tourism, agroforestry, and rural industries to reduce mining dependency.

4. Technological Surveillance

  • Satellite-Based Monitoring to track illegal mining activities.
  • Mining Surveillance System (MSS) by the Ministry of Mines can strengthen enforcement (as seen in Karnataka).

5. Community Participation

  • Strengthen Forest Rights Act, 2006 to involve local communities in decision-making.
  • Mandate local consent before granting mining approvals.

February 2025
MTWTFSS
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 
Categories