Current Affairs Quiz 08 March 2025
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Current Affairs Quiz 08 March 2025 For UPSC Exam
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Electors Photo Identification Card (EPIC) Number
Consider the following statements regarding the Electors Photo Identification Card (EPIC) number:
1. The EPIC number is a 10-digit unique identification number assigned to every registered voter in India.
2. The Election Commission of India (ECI) issues the EPIC number as proof of identity during elections.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?CorrectAnswer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Explanation:
• Statement 1: Correct. The EPIC number is a unique 10-digit alphanumeric identifier assigned to every registered voter in India by the Election Commission of India (ECI). It ensures transparency, reduces voter fraud, and streamlines the electoral process. While the format is typically 10 digits (e.g., XYZ1234567), it is distinct from other voter ID numbers printed on the card.
• Statement 2: Correct. The ECI issues the EPIC as an official proof of identity for voters during elections. It is linked to the electoral roll, ensuring single registration and maintaining the integrity of the voting process. The card is widely accepted as a valid ID for electoral purposes.
• Conclusion: Both statements are accurate, making (c) the correct choice.IncorrectAnswer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Explanation:
• Statement 1: Correct. The EPIC number is a unique 10-digit alphanumeric identifier assigned to every registered voter in India by the Election Commission of India (ECI). It ensures transparency, reduces voter fraud, and streamlines the electoral process. While the format is typically 10 digits (e.g., XYZ1234567), it is distinct from other voter ID numbers printed on the card.
• Statement 2: Correct. The ECI issues the EPIC as an official proof of identity for voters during elections. It is linked to the electoral roll, ensuring single registration and maintaining the integrity of the voting process. The card is widely accepted as a valid ID for electoral purposes.
• Conclusion: Both statements are accurate, making (c) the correct choice. - Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Priority Watch List by USTR
With reference to the “Priority Watch List” maintained by the United States Trade Representative (USTR), consider the following statements:
1. Countries placed on the Priority Watch List are those that the U.S. considers to have serious deficiencies in intellectual property rights (IPR) protection and enforcement.
2. Being on the Priority Watch List can lead to unilateral trade sanctions by the U.S. under the Special 301 Report.
3. India has never been placed on the Priority Watch List by the USTR.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?CorrectAnswer: (a) 1 and 2 only
Explanation:
• Statement 1: Correct. The Priority Watch List, part of the USTR’s Special 301 Report, identifies countries with significant deficiencies in IPR protection and enforcement that adversely affect U.S. businesses. Examples include weak patent laws or rampant piracy.
• Statement 2: Correct. Placement on the list signals potential trade sanctions or retaliatory measures under U.S. law if the country fails to address IPR issues. While not automatic, it increases pressure for compliance.
• Statement 3: Incorrect. India has frequently been placed on the Priority Watch List, including in recent years (e.g., 2023 and prior), due to concerns over pharmaceutical patents, copyright enforcement, and software piracy. As of March 08, 2025, no significant shift has been noted to remove India from this list permanently.
• Conclusion: Only statements 1 and 2 are correct, making (a) the right answer.IncorrectAnswer: (a) 1 and 2 only
Explanation:
• Statement 1: Correct. The Priority Watch List, part of the USTR’s Special 301 Report, identifies countries with significant deficiencies in IPR protection and enforcement that adversely affect U.S. businesses. Examples include weak patent laws or rampant piracy.
• Statement 2: Correct. Placement on the list signals potential trade sanctions or retaliatory measures under U.S. law if the country fails to address IPR issues. While not automatic, it increases pressure for compliance.
• Statement 3: Incorrect. India has frequently been placed on the Priority Watch List, including in recent years (e.g., 2023 and prior), due to concerns over pharmaceutical patents, copyright enforcement, and software piracy. As of March 08, 2025, no significant shift has been noted to remove India from this list permanently.
• Conclusion: Only statements 1 and 2 are correct, making (a) the right answer. - Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Definition of the “Global South”
Which of the following best describes the “Global South”?CorrectAnswer: (b) A term for developing and emerging economies, often in Asia, Africa, and Latin America
Explanation:
• Option (a): Incorrect. The “Global South” is not strictly geographical; it includes countries in the Northern Hemisphere (e.g., India) and excludes some Southern Hemisphere nations (e.g., Australia).
• Option (b): Correct. The term refers to developing and emerging economies, primarily in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, emphasizing shared socio-economic challenges rather than precise location.
• Option (c): Incorrect. There is no military alliance called the “Global South” led by India and China.
• Option (d): Incorrect. No such formal trade bloc exists involving only India, China, and South American nations under this label.
• Conclusion: (b) accurately defines the “Global South.”IncorrectAnswer: (b) A term for developing and emerging economies, often in Asia, Africa, and Latin America
Explanation:
• Option (a): Incorrect. The “Global South” is not strictly geographical; it includes countries in the Northern Hemisphere (e.g., India) and excludes some Southern Hemisphere nations (e.g., Australia).
• Option (b): Correct. The term refers to developing and emerging economies, primarily in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, emphasizing shared socio-economic challenges rather than precise location.
• Option (c): Incorrect. There is no military alliance called the “Global South” led by India and China.
• Option (d): Incorrect. No such formal trade bloc exists involving only India, China, and South American nations under this label.
• Conclusion: (b) accurately defines the “Global South.” - Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Undertrial Prisoners in India
Which of the following statements about undertrial prisoners in India is FALSE, based on judicial precedents?CorrectAnswer: (c) Undertrials in preventive detention have the same rights as convicted prisoners
Explanation:
• Option (a): Correct. Judicial precedents, including Hussainara Khatoon (1979), hold that indefinite detention of undertrials beyond the maximum sentence violates Article 21.
• Option (b): Correct. Section 436A of the CrPC (inserted in 2005) grants undertrials the right to seek bail if they’ve served half the maximum sentence, unless exceptions apply (e.g., death penalty cases).
• Option (c): Incorrect (False). Undertrials in preventive detention (e.g., under UAPA or NSA) have fewer rights than convicted prisoners or regular undertrials, as preventive detention is preemptive and not punitive. They lack rights like automatic bail consideration.
• Option (d): Correct. The Hussainara Khatoon case emphasized the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, highlighting the plight of undertrials languishing in jails.
• Conclusion: (c) is the false statement.IncorrectAnswer: (c) Undertrials in preventive detention have the same rights as convicted prisoners
Explanation:
• Option (a): Correct. Judicial precedents, including Hussainara Khatoon (1979), hold that indefinite detention of undertrials beyond the maximum sentence violates Article 21.
• Option (b): Correct. Section 436A of the CrPC (inserted in 2005) grants undertrials the right to seek bail if they’ve served half the maximum sentence, unless exceptions apply (e.g., death penalty cases).
• Option (c): Incorrect (False). Undertrials in preventive detention (e.g., under UAPA or NSA) have fewer rights than convicted prisoners or regular undertrials, as preventive detention is preemptive and not punitive. They lack rights like automatic bail consideration.
• Option (d): Correct. The Hussainara Khatoon case emphasized the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, highlighting the plight of undertrials languishing in jails.
• Conclusion: (c) is the false statement. - Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Sexual Harassment at the Workplace
In the context of Justice Trivedi’s remarks, which landmark case established guidelines to address sexual harassment at the workplace, reinforcing strict legal enforcement?CorrectAnswer: (a) Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
Explanation:
• Option (a): Correct. The Vishaka case established binding guidelines to prevent workplace sexual harassment, mandating employer accountability and strict enforcement mechanisms. This aligns with Justice Trivedi’s call (March 2025) for empowering women through law enforcement rather than sympathy.
• Option (b): Incorrect. Shayara Bano (2017) dealt with triple talaq, not workplace harassment.
• Option (c): Incorrect. Joseph Shine (2018) decriminalized adultery, unrelated to harassment guidelines.
• Option (d): Incorrect. Maneka Gandhi (1978) expanded Article 21’s scope but did not address sexual harassment.
• Conclusion: (a) is the relevant case supporting strict legal enforcement.IncorrectAnswer: (a) Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
Explanation:
• Option (a): Correct. The Vishaka case established binding guidelines to prevent workplace sexual harassment, mandating employer accountability and strict enforcement mechanisms. This aligns with Justice Trivedi’s call (March 2025) for empowering women through law enforcement rather than sympathy.
• Option (b): Incorrect. Shayara Bano (2017) dealt with triple talaq, not workplace harassment.
• Option (c): Incorrect. Joseph Shine (2018) decriminalized adultery, unrelated to harassment guidelines.
• Option (d): Incorrect. Maneka Gandhi (1978) expanded Article 21’s scope but did not address sexual harassment.
• Conclusion: (a) is the relevant case supporting strict legal enforcement.
