Content:
- RBI cuts repo rate by 0.25%, trims GDP growth forecast
- India ends transshipment facility for Bangladesh exports, cites congestion
- Democracy and federalism in the delimitation debate
- Will aviation disputes be easier to resolve?
- India better off than others in tariff row: RBI Governor
- As wildfires scorch the earth, the Arctic biome rejects more carbon
RBI cuts repo rate by 0.25%, trims GDP growth forecast
Context : The Reserve Bank of India, amid global trade tensions and slowing domestic demand, cut the repo rate by 0.25% to 6%. It also revised the GDP growth forecast downward from 6.7% to 6.5%, signaling a shift to a more accommodative policy stance.
Relevance : GS 3(Economy )

Repo Rate Cut:
- Repo rate reduced by 25 basis points (bps) from 6.25% to 6%.
- This marks the second consecutive rate cut of 25 bps by the RBI.
- Decision was unanimous by the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC).
Shift in Policy Stance:
- Stance shifted from “neutral” to “accommodative”.
- Signals RBI’s priority is reviving growth rather than controlling inflation.
- Opens the door for possible future rate cuts.
GDP Growth Forecast Lowered:
- RBI revised India’s GDP growth forecast from 6.7% to 6.5%.
- Reflects concerns about slowing domestic and global economic activity.
Global Trade War Impact:
- Escalation in U.S.-China trade tensions cited as a major concern.
- Higher tariffs are expected to hurt India’s export sector.
- Global slowdown affecting business confidence and investment decisions.
Impact on Borrowers & Depositors:
- Positive for borrowers: Lower interest burden on home, auto, and personal loans.
- Negative for savers: Likely decline in interest income on deposits.
RBI Governor’s Remarks (Sanjay Malhotra):
- Trade war creates uncertainty, affecting investment and spending.
- External slowdown and tariff impacts will dampen India’s growth.
- Current policy aims at stimulating economic activity.
India ends transshipment facility for Bangladesh exports, cites congestion
Context:
- Transshipment facility was initiated by India in 2020 to support Bangladesh’s exports to Nepal, Bhutan, and Myanmar via Indian ports and airports.
- It aimed to facilitate regional connectivity and ease logistical challenges for landlocked neighbors.
Relevance : GS 2(International Relations)
What is Transshipment?
Transfer of cargo at an intermediate port from one vessel/transport mode to another before reaching the final destination.
- Commonly used when direct shipping routes are impractical or uneconomical.
- Essential for landlocked countries (like Nepal and Bhutan) and countries with limited port capacity (like Bangladesh).
Transshipment and Bangladesh
- Bangladesh, with limited deep-sea port infrastructure, depends on transshipment via foreign ports (e.g., Singapore, Colombo) or neighboring countries (especially India).
- Key sectors, like the Readymade Garments (RMG) industry, rely on smooth transit for exports to Nepal, Bhutan, and Myanmar.
India’s Transshipment Facility to Bangladesh (Since 2020)
- India had allowed Bangladesh to use its ports and airports for exporting goods to Nepal, Bhutan, and Myanmar.
- Enhanced regional connectivity, improved logistics, and supported BBIN (Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal) integration.
Withdrawal of Facility (April 8, 2025):
- India terminated the facility citing significant congestion at its airports and ports.
- Caused logistical delays, higher costs, and backlogs, impacting India’s own exports.
Official Justification:
- MEA clarified the move was due to operational issues, not political motives.
- Exports from Bangladesh to Nepal and Bhutan through Indian territory will continue, but transshipment via Indian facilities will not.
Geopolitical Undercurrents:
- Withdrawal came days after Muhammad Yunus (Bangladesh’s interim govt. adviser) visited Beijing.
- Yunus advocated for enhanced China-Bangladesh trade and greater access for China through Bangladeshi ports to Northeast India.
- India did not confirm a direct link, but timing raises speculation of a strategic signal.
Economic Implications for Bangladesh:
- Readymade garments (RMG) sector, a major export from Bangladesh, may face disruption.
- Exports to landlocked neighbors now face logistical hurdles and increased costs without Indian port access.
Regional Trade Impact:
- May strain Bangladesh’s trade logistics, especially with Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar.
- Could push Bangladesh to seek alternate routes or develop self-reliant port infrastructure.
- May indirectly boost Chinese influence if Bangladesh diversifies toward China-led corridors.
India’s Strategic Concerns:
- India appears protective of its logistical ecosystem, especially amid rising exports.
- Likely a calibrated balancing act — addressing internal congestion while signaling geopolitical caution regarding China’s growing regional footprint.
Democracy and federalism in the delimitation debate
Context : The delimitation debate involves a conflict between two principles:
- Democracy: “One person, one vote, one value” — equal weight to each citizen’s vote.
- Federalism: India is a Union of States — States must retain equitable power and identity regardless of population changes.
Relevance : GS 2(Polity , Constitution , Governance)
Legal & Constitutional Framework
- Article 81(2) provides a two-step process for Lok Sabha seat allocation:
- Step 1: Seats allocated among States based on population (Article 81(2)(a)).
- Step 2: States divided internally into constituencies with roughly equal population (Article 81(2)(b)).
- Both clauses include “so far as practicable”, allowing for flexibility and political accommodation.
84th and 87th Constitutional Amendments (2001, 2003)
- Apportionment between States frozen based on 1971 Census (to reward population control).
- Delimitation within States done using 2001 Census.
- Delimitation Commission (2002) recommendations implemented in 2008.
- Next inter-State redistribution deferred until after first Census post-2026, per 84th Amendment.
Unequal Vote Values Across States
- Due to freeze and population changes, voter representation per MP has become unequal.
- In 1967: MPs represented ~4.2–5.3 lakh electors across States (more equal).
- In 2024:
- Kerala MP: 13.9 lakh electors.
- UP/Bihar MP: 19.3 lakh electors.
- Rajasthan MP: 21.4 lakh electors.
Vote Value Disparity – Explained
- National median = 1 vote value.
- If MP has double the population of median: vote value = 0.5.
- If MP has half the population: vote value = 2.
- In 2024:
- Kerala: +30% vote value.
- Tamil Nadu: +13%, Odisha: +12%, Punjab: +9%.
- Rajasthan: –16%, UP & Bihar: –7% each.
Impact of Redrawing on State Representation
- If delimitation is done on current population:
- High-population growth States gain more seats.
- States with stable populations lose representation.
- Example:
- Rajasthan could go from 4.6% to 5.5% of LS seats.
- Kerala could drop from 3.7% to 2.8%.
Analogy: Joint Family and Landholding
- India = joint family; States = constituent families.
- Seats = land parcels allocated by family size.
- Over time, families (States) grew/declined unevenly.
- Thus, per capita share (vote value) has become inequitable, like unequal land division.
Key Takeaways
- Federal democracy requires balancing two values:
- Individual equality (democracy).
- Collective equity among States (federalism).
- Upcoming delimitation post-2026 will require delicate political negotiation.
- Raises questions:
- Should States that controlled population be penalized?
- Can equal vote value be achieved without federal imbalance?
Will aviation disputes be easier to resolve?
What does the Bill entail?
- Implements the Cape Town Convention and Aircraft Protocol, signed by India in 2008.
- Establishes a legal framework for aircraft leasing and repossession, aligning Indian aviation law with international standards.
- Applies to aircraft, helicopters, engines, and other aviation assets.
Relevance : GS 2(Governance , International Relations)
Key Provisions of the Bill
- Designates DGCA as the Registry Authority for registering and deregistering aircraft.
- Obligates airlines (debtors) to report dues and comply with lease terms.
- Grants lessors the right to repossess aircraft in case of default within 2 calendar months or a shorter agreed period.
- Contains an overriding clause—the Bill takes precedence over any other Indian law in case of conflict.
What is the Cape Town Convention and Protocol?
- A UN-backed international treaty (ICAO, 2001) for protecting creditors’ interests in high-value mobile equipment.
- Standardizes leasing transactions globally, offering legal remedies to lessors in case of default.
- India ratified it in 2008, but implementation lagged due to lack of enabling legislation.
Why was the Bill necessary?
- Past disputes (e.g. GoFirst, SpiceJet, Kingfisher) highlighted inconsistencies between Indian insolvency law and global norms.
- The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) gave protection to airlines (e.g. GoFirst moratorium), preventing lessors from repossessing aircraft.
- Aimed to improve India’s Cape Town Compliance Index score (moved from 50 to 62, target 90).
- Encourages aircraft leasing via GIFT City, Gujarat.
Impact on Leasing Industry
Positive Aspects:
- Brings legal clarity and reduces dispute resolution time.
- May encourage foreign lessors to lease to Indian carriers.
- Expected to lower perceived risk, especially for new or smaller airlines.
- Possibility of lower leasing rates (8-10%) and improved airfare affordability (though contested).
Concerns Raised:
- Taxation regime remains complex, with unpredictable enforcement.
- Lessors face IT notices for operating via SPVs without a permanent establishment in India.
- Government seen as pushing for domestic leasing through GIFT City—viewed by some as coercive.
- Creditworthiness and business fundamentals of airlines, not just legal framework, drive leasing decisions.
- Impact on airfares likely marginal, as pricing is demand-driven.
Conclusion: Will aviation disputes be easier to resolve?
Yes, in terms of legal process and repossession timelines—the Bill is a step forward.
No, if broader ecosystem issues like taxation, compliance burden, and business risks remain unaddressed.
India better off than others in tariff row: RBI Governor
Context: Global Tariff War Impact
- The U.S., under President Trump, has intensified tariff measures, triggering a global trade war.
- These developments have global macroeconomic implications, prompting central banks to reassess growth projections.
Relevance : GS 3(Economy ,Global Trade)
RBI’s Response & Growth Revision
- RBI revised India’s GDP growth projection for FY25 down by 20 basis points, from 6.7% to 6.5%.
- Reason: Global trade and policy uncertainties resulting from the tariff war.
Why India is Less Affected
- Low export exposure to the U.S.: Exports to the U.S. account for only about 2% of India’s GDP.
- Smaller trade surplus: India’s trade surplus with the U.S. is modest compared to countries like China and Germany.
- Diversified trade basket: India has a broader, more balanced trade strategy, reducing overdependence on any single market.
- Comparisons:
- China: Exports = 19% of GDP
- Germany: 37%
- EU average: 30%+
- Several smaller economies: ~80% of GDP from exports
Inflation Impact: Mixed Outlook
- Tariffs can shrink global demand, which may:
- Ease imported inflation pressures (disinflationary effect).
- But overall, inflation impact is uncertain—RBI more concerned about growth than inflation.
Currency Stability & Resilience
- INR outlook stable: RBI not worried about immediate volatility.
- China may devalue the Yuan in response to U.S. tariffs, but:
- INR will find its own level in the forex market.
- RBI will intervene if excessive volatility occurs.
- Forex reserves at ~$700 billion, offering strong cushion.
- Sustainable fiscal and current account deficits indicate macroeconomic strength.
Strategic Advantages for India
- Lower dependence on trade makes India more insulated from global trade shocks.
- Scope for domestic demand-driven growth rather than export-led, unlike export-heavy economies.
- India may gain competitiveness in global supply chains as firms seek to diversify away from China.
Conclusion: India’s Position
- India is relatively insulated from the full brunt of the global tariff war.
- Challenges remain, but India’s macro buffers (reserves, deficits) and diversified trade strategy provide stability.
- The real concern is global growth slowdown, not direct tariff shocks.
As wildfires scorch the earth, the Arctic biome rejects more carbon
Context : Global Wildfire Crisis & Carbon Emissions
- Escalation of Wildfires Globally:
- Severe wildfires in 2025 in California (Eaton & Palisades), Texas, Oklahoma, and Japan caused massive destruction: over 14,000 structures destroyed, thousands evacuated, and dozens of lives lost.
- The Eaton Fire alone burned over 16,000 hectares; the Japan fire (near Ofunato City) affected nearly 2,900 hectares, the worst in five decades.
Relevance : GS 3(Disaster Management , Environment and Ecology)
- Wildfire Emissions Data:
- In January 2025 alone, wildfires emitted 800,000 tonnes of carbon, 4x higher than the same period a decade ago (CAMS data).
- Wildfires’ radiative power (heat emission) exceeded the 2003–2024 average by an order of magnitude — indicating intensifying heat signatures.
Arctic Boreal Zone (ABZ): From Carbon Sink to Carbon Source
- ABZ’s Traditional Role:
- Comprises tundra, permafrost, wetlands, and boreal forests.
- Acts as a major carbon sink, historically storing vast carbon in frozen soils and vegetation.
- Transition to Carbon Source:
- A third of ABZ now emits more carbon than it absorbs.
- Shift began before 1990, accelerated by wildfires in Eastern Siberia (2003) and Timmins, Canada (2012).
- Study Insights (Nature Climate Change):
- Analysis from 200 monitoring sites (1990–2020): shows net carbon emission from many Arctic regions.
- Alaska (44%), Northern Europe (25%), and Siberia (13%) were key carbon-emitting regions.
- Non-Summer Emissions > Summer Uptake:
- Emissions during non-summer months (Sep–May) now exceed summer (Jun–Aug) carbon absorption.
- Sign of long-term seasonal imbalances in carbon sequestration.
Feedback Loop: Warming–Wildfire–Carbon Emissions
- Permafrost Thawing:
- Rising Arctic temperatures accelerate permafrost melt, leading to organic decay and CO₂ release.
- Changes in plant types, drier soils, and higher topsoil temperatures worsen the release.
- Vicious Cycle:
- Wildfires release carbon → Carbon worsens global warming → Warming dries land, increases fire risk → More wildfires.
- Creates a self-reinforcing feedback loop with potential tipping points for climate systems.
India’s Forest Fires & Carbon Emissions
- Fire-Prone States:
- As per India State of Forest Report (Dec 2024), Uttarakhand, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh topped forest fire incidents.
- Uttarakhand alone saw 5,315 fires between Nov 2022 and June 2023.
- Hotspot Trends:
- Fire hotspot counts declining slightly:
- 2.23 lakh (2021–22) → 2.03 lakh (2023–24).
- Fire hotspot counts declining slightly:
- Temperature Rise:
- IIT-KGP & IITM, Pune: Land temperatures rising:
- 0.1º–0.3ºC/decade (pre-monsoon);
- 0.2º–0.4ºC/decade (post-monsoon).
- IIT-KGP & IITM, Pune: Land temperatures rising:
- Heatwaves = Fire Risk:
- Earlier, slower-moving, longer-lasting heatwaves are amplifying fire vulnerability.
- India emits ~69 million tonnes of CO₂/year from forest fires (Chase India).
Broader Environmental & Policy Implications
- Loss of Carbon Sink Services:
- ABZ’s shift erodes a key natural buffer against global emissions.
- Increases dependence on anthropogenic emission cuts and carbon capture technologies.
- Climate Justice Concerns:
- Countries with minimal historical emissions, like India, face climate risks from emissions elsewhere.
- Highlights the need for global climate finance, adaptation funds, and early-warning systems.
- Policy Responses Needed:
- Better forest management, fire prevention, and community-based resilience programs.
- In Arctic and elsewhere, international cooperation vital to protect shared global commons.