50th Chief Justice of India

Home » 50th Chief Justice of India

Context:

Justice Dhanajaya Yeshwant Chandrachud was appointed as the 50th Chief Justice of India (CJI) succeeding the 49th CJI Uday Umesh Lalit.

Justice Chandrachud will have a relatively longer tenure of two years and is due to retire on 10th November, 2024.

Relevance:

GS II- Polity and Governance

Dimensions of the Article:

The Chief Justice of India and the Judges of the Supreme Court (SC) are appointed by the President under clause (2) of Article 124 of the Constitution.
As far as the CJI is concerned, the outgoing CJI recommends his successor.
The Union Law Minister forwards the recommendation to the Prime Minister who, in turn, advises the President.
SC in the Second Judges Case (1993), ruled that the senior most judge of the Supreme Court should alone be appointed to the office of the CJI.
The Supreme Court collegium is headed by the Chief Justice of India and comprises four other senior most judges of the court.
The collegium system is the system of appointment and transfer of judges that has evolved through judgments of the Supreme Court (Judges Cases), and not by an Act of Parliament or by a provision of the Constitution.
In 2019, the SC ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005.

The Indian Constitution says in Article 124 (3) that in order to be appointed as a judge in the Supreme Court of India, the person has to fit in the following criteria:
- He/She is a citizen of India
- Has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession;
- Has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist

It is common to refer to the office as primus inter pares – first amongst equals.
Besides his adjudicatory role, the CJI also plays the role of the administrative head of the Court.
In his administrative capacity, the Chief Justice exercises the prerogative of allocating cases to particular benches.
The Chief Justice also decides the number of judges that will hear a case.
Thus, he can influence the result by simply choosing judges that he thinks may favour a particular outcome.
Such administrative powers can be exercised without collegial consensus, and without any stated reasons.

He/She can be removed by an order of the President only after an address by Parliament has been presented to President.
This should be supported by a special majority of each House of Parliament (i.e., by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting).
Grounds of Removal: Proved misbehaviour or Incapacity (Article 124(4)).

-Source: The Hindu