Context:
- The Delhi High Court addressed the complexities surrounding adolescent romantic relationships under the POCSO Act.
- The case involved a man acquitted of sexual assault charges filed by the father of a 16-year-old girl.
Relevance :GS 1(Society ) , GS 2(Social Issues, Governance )
Court Observations:
- Compassionate Approach: Legal systems should prioritize understanding over punishment in consensual adolescent relationships.
- Consent Consideration: The girl stated her relationship with the man was consensual, influencing the court’s view.
- POCSO Act Interpretation:
- POCSO aims to protect children under 18 but doesn’t distinguish consensual relationships between adolescents.
- Any sexual act with a minor under 18, even if consensual, falls under POCSO provisions.
Judgment Highlights:
- Justice Jasmeet Singh upheld the trial court’s February 2020 acquittal, calling it “well-reasoned.”
- Stressed that while safeguarding minors is essential, the law should recognize consensual adolescent love without exploitation.
- Emphasized adolescents’ right to form emotional connections while ensuring protection from coercion and abuse.
Implications:
- Sparks debate on reforming POCSO to account for consensual adolescent relationships.
- Raises concerns about balancing child protection with respecting adolescents’ autonomy.
- Potential for legislative discussions on age of consent nuances and societal perceptions of young love.
