0 Comments

Introduction

  • In September 2013, the Supreme Court of India mandated the implementation of the “None of the Above” (NOTA) option by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to ensure the confidentiality of voters’ choices.
  • The ECI introduced a distinct symbol for NOTA to enable voters to exercise this option.
  • The primary goal of NOTA is to allow voters who do not wish to vote for any candidate to exercise their right without compromising their confidentiality.

Body

  • In 2004, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) petitioned the Supreme Court for directives to the ECI on protecting voters’ right to secrecy when choosing not to vote. They argued that the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961, breached confidentiality since the Presiding Officer recorded the details of voters who chose not to vote.
  • The central government contended that the right to vote is a statutory right guaranteed by law, not the Constitution, and that only those who voted had a right to secrecy.
  • If NOTA receives the highest number of votes in a constituency, it has no legal consequence; the candidate with the second-highest votes wins. This was pointed out by Assistant Solicitor General P P Malhotra.
  • The Supreme Court, however, held that secrecy must be maintained whether a voter chooses to vote or not.
  • The apex court is currently considering a petition for elections to be declared “null and void” if NOTA receives the highest number of votes.
  • Shiv Khera, author and founder of the Country First Foundation, approached the court in April 2024 seeking guidelines for the ECI on the implementation of NOTA with consequences for candidates who do not surpass NOTA.

Conclusion

The extraordinary result in Indore, where NOTA received the most votes ever in a constituency, highlights the significance of this option. The previous record was in Gopalganj, Bihar, in 2019, with 51,660 NOTA votes.

NOTA votes exceed those of all individual candidates, fresh elections may be held in the affected states and union territories, emphasizing the potential impact of this option on the electoral process.

Legacy Editor Changed status to publish July 24, 2024